Effectiveness and Components of Web-Based Interventions on Weight Changes in Adults Who Were Overweight and Obese: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analyses.

Overweight and obesity have reached epidemic proportions worldwide. The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in an increased need for remote implementation of weight-loss interventions; therefore, the effectiveness of web-based interventions needed to be assessed. This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of web-based interventions and their potency in facilitating weight changes in adults who were overweight or obese. We searched PubMed and Ichu-shi Web from the first year of inclusion in each database until the search date (30 September 2020). Among 1466 articles retrieved from the two databases and manual search, 97 were selected to undergo qualitative analysis and 51 articles were subjected to quantitative analysis. Qualitative analysis of 97 articles demonstrated that articles showing significant effectiveness mostly used the following components: social support, self-monitoring for behavior, self-monitoring for the outcome (weight), behavioral goal setting, information about health consequences, and outcome goal setting. Quantitative analysis of 51 articles showed a significant effectiveness of web-based intervention (standardized mean difference, -0.57; 95% confidence interval, -0.75 to -0.40). This study demonstrated the effectiveness of web-based interventions on weight change in adults with overweight and obesity. Subgroup meta-analyses identified personalized information provision and expert advice to be remarkably effective components.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on epidemiology, treatment, and outcome of major trauma in Japan in 2020: a retrospective observational nationwide registry-based study.

Aim: The nationwide impact of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic on major trauma in Japan is unknown. The nationwide registry-based data of the Japanese Trauma Data Bank were analyzed to elucidate the impact of COVID-19 on the epidemiology, treatment, and outcomes of major trauma patients. Methods: Among patients transported directly from the injury site by ambulance with an Injury Severity Score of ≥16, we compared patients managed from April to December in 2019 to those managed from April to December in 2020. Results: In total, 9792 patients were included in this study (2019, n = 5194; 2020, n = 4598). There were no significant differences in age or sex, but there were significant differences between 2019 and 2020 in the rates of "self-injury (suicide)", "motor vehicle accident", "fall from height", "fall down", and "fall to the ground", which are factors associated with patient age. Injury severity in 2019 and 2020 did not differ to a statistically significant extent, but the rate of major spinal injury increased. The time of prehospital care significantly increased in 2020 compared to 2019. There was no noticeable change in hospital treatment or in-hospital mortality between 2019 and 2020. Conclusion: This study suggests that the COVID-19 pandemic might have altered the injuries of major trauma; however, medical services for major trauma were well supplied in Japan in 2020.

Public-access defibrillation and favorable neurological outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Early public-access defibrillation (PAD) effectively improves the outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA), but several strategies implemented to prevent the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) could decrease the availability of PAD and worsen outcomes after OHCA. Previous studies have reported conflicting findings, and there is a paucity of nationwide observations. This study aims to investigate the impact of COVID-19 on PAD and OHCA outcomes using a nationwide OHCA registry in Japan, where PAD is well-documented. METHODS: This secondary analysis of the All-Japan Utstein Registry, a prospective population-based nationwide registry of OHCA patients, included patients aged ≥ 18 years with bystander-witnessed OHCA and an initial shockable rhythm who were transported to medical facilities between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2020. The analytical parameters of this study were the proportion of patients who underwent PAD and patients with one-month survival with favorable neurological outcomes, defined as a cerebral performance category score of 1 or 2. We compared the data between 2019 and 2020 using a multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: During the study period, 1,930,273 OHCA patients were registered; of these, 78,302 were eligible for the analysis. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, the proportion of OHCA patients who underwent PAD and demonstrated favorable neurological outcomes increased gradually from 2005 to 2019 (P for trend < 0.001). The proportion of patient who had PAD were 17.7% (876/4959) in 2019 and 15.1% (735/4869) in 2020, respectively. The proportion of patient who displayed favorable neurological outcomes were 25.1% (1245/4959) in 2019 and 22.8% (1109/4869) in 2020, respectively. After adjusting for potential confounders, a significant reduction in the proportion of PAD was observed compared to that in 2019 (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-0.97), while no significant reduction was observed in favorable neurological outcomes (AOR, 0.97; 95% CI 0.87-1.07). CONCLUSION: The proportion of PAD clearly decreased in 2020, probably due to the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan. In contrast, no significant reduction was observed in favorable neurological outcomes.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes in older adults in Japan.

Aim: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has negatively affected access to healthcare and treatment. This study aimed to explore the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on older adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in Japan, a country with a super-aging society. Methods: This secondary analysis of the All-Japan Utstein Registry included patients aged 65 years and older with bystander-witnessed OHCA between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2020. Survival outcomes were compared by time period using multivariable logistic regression analyses. The primary outcome measured was the one-month survival rate with neurologically favorable outcomes. Results: Before the COVID-19 pandemic, survival outcomes were steadily improving, and 32,024 patients in 2019 and 31,894 in 2020 were eligible for analysis. The proportions of conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation and shock by public-access automated external defibrillators were lower in 2020 than in 2019 (6.7% versus 5.7%, p < 0.001 and 2.5% versus 2.1%, p < 0.001, respectively). Compared to 2019, the one-month survival after OHCA and prehospital return of spontaneous circulation decreased significantly in 2020 than in 2019 (7.7% versus 6.6%, adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83-0.94, and 16.8% versus 14.9%, AOR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.83-0.91, respectively). The proportion of neurologically favorable outcomes also decreased, but the decrease was not statistically significant (3.4% versus 2.8%, AOR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.83-1.01). Conclusion: In this population-focused, bystander-witnessed study regarding OHCA, the analysis of nationwide registry data revealed that the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with reduced survival among older adults with OHCA in Japan.

Association of the COVID-19 Pandemic With Prehospital Characteristics and Outcomes of Pediatric Patients With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Japan, 2005-2020.

This cohort study investigates the association of the COVID-19 pandemic with prehospital characteristics and outcomes of pediatric patients with out-of-hospital-cardiac arrest in Japan.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Prehospital Intervention and Survival of Patients With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Osaka City, Japan.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic may have influenced the prehospital emergency care and deaths of individuals experiencing an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).Methods and Results: We analyzed the registry data of 2,420 and 2,371 OHCA patients in Osaka City, Japan in 2019 and 2020, respectively, according to the 3 waves of the COVID-19 pandemic. Patient outcomes were compared using multivariable logistic regression analyses with the 2019 data as the reference. Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was initiated significantly less frequently in 2020 than in 2019 (2019: 48.0%, 2020: 42.7%, P<0.001), particularly during the first wave (2019: 47.2%, 2020: 42.9%, P=0.046) and second wave (2019: 48.1%, 2020: 41.2%, P=0.010), but not during the third wave (2019: 49.2%, 2020: 44.1%, P=0.066). The public-access automated external defibrillator was less frequently applied during the first wave (2019: 12.6%, 2020: 9.9%, P=0.043), with no significant difference during the second wave (2019: 12.5%, 2020: 12.8%, P=0.863) and third wave (2019: 13.7%, 2020: 13.0%, P=0.722). There was a significant difference in 1-month survival with favorable neurological outcomes (2019: 4.6%, 2020: 3.3%, P=0.018), with a 28% reduction in the adjusted odds ratio in 2020 (0.72; 95% confidence interval: 0.52-0.99, P=0.044). CONCLUSIONS: Bystander CPR and neurologically favorable outcomes after OHCA decreased significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan.

Survival following an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Japan in 2020 versus 2019 according to the cause.

Aim: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has led to an increase in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) and mortality. However, there has been no reports in Japan using nationwide registry data. We compared survival among patients with OHCAs and detailed information on the cause during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020), and during the pre-pandemic period (2019). Methods: Using a Japanese population-based retrospective cohort study design, we analyzed registry data on 39,324 and 39,170 patients with OHCAs in 2019 and 2020, respectively. We compared patient outcomes in 2019 and 2020 using univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses. Results: The proportion of OHCAs of cardiac origin increased significantly from 61.6% in 2019 to 62.7% in 2020 (P = 0.001). The use of bystander CPR (6.9% versus 5.7%, P < 0.001) and publicaccess automated external defibrillator pads (3.7% versus 3.0%, P < 0.001) decreased significantly from 2019 to 2020. The 1-month survival for OHCA of cardiac origin (12.1% versus 10.7%; adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87-1.00), asphyxia (10.9% versus 8.8%; adjusted OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.70-0.92), and external causes (adjusted OR 0.66; 95% CI 0.46-0.96), also decreased significantly from 2019 to 2020. Conclusions: In Japan, the 1-month survival after OHCA of cardiac origin, or due to asphyxia or external causes, decreased significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic period.

Clinical outcomes among out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients treated by extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: The CRITICAL study in Osaka.

AIM: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is performed in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients, and the eligibility has been conventionally determined based on three criteria (initial cardiac rhythm, time to hospital arrival within 45 minutes, and age <75 years) in Japan. Owing to limited information, this study descriptively determined neurological outcomes after applying the three criteria among OHCA patients who underwent ECPR. METHODS: This study conducted a post-hoc analysis of data from the Comprehensive Registry of Intensive Care for OHCA Survival (CRITICAL) study. This was a multi-institutional prospective observational study of OHCA patients in Osaka Prefecture, Japan. All adult (aged ≥18 years) OHCA patients with internal medical causes treated with ECPR between 1 July 2012 and 31 December 2019 were evaluated. We described one-month neurological favourable outcomes based on the three criteria (initial shockable, time to hospital arrival within 45 minutes, and age <75 years), and we compared them using the chi-square test. RESULTS: Among 18,379 patients screened from the CRITICAL study database, we included 517 OHCA patients treated by ECPR; 311 (60.2%) patients met all three criteria. Favourable neurological outcomes were as follows: patients meeting no or one criterion: 2.3% (1/43), those meeting two criteria: 8% (13/163), and those meeting all criteria: 16.1% (50/311) (P-value = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, approximately 60% of patients treated by ECPR met the three criteria (initial shockable, time to hospital arrival within 45 minutes, and age <75 years), and the greater the number of criteria met, the better were the neurological outcomes achieved.

Changes in percutaneous coronary intervention practice in Japan during the COVID-19 outbreak: LIFE Study.

AIM: The global outbreak of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has had widespread effects on clinical practice, and is reportedly associated with reduced percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) rates in the US and Italy. This study aimed to ascertain the influence of the COVID-19 outbreak on PCI practice in Japan. METHODS: In a retrospective analysis of claims data from National Health Insurance and Later-Stage Elderly Healthcare System enrollees in Kobe City, Japan, we examined the changes in PCI incidence before and during the COVID-19 outbreak. Percutaneous coronary intervention incidence during the COVID-19 outbreak in 2020 was compared with that of the same (pre-outbreak) period in 2019 using a Poisson regression analysis with the monthly number of PCIs as the dependent variable. RESULTS: A total of 639 patients underwent PCI in Kobe City between February and May 2020. The results showed a 19% reduction in all PCI procedures during the outbreak relative to the pre-outbreak period (P = 0.001). There were no significant changes in non-elective PCIs for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) cases, but a 25% reduction in elective PCIs for non-ACS cases (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 outbreak was associated with a decline in elective PCIs for non-ACS cases, but did not appear to influence non-elective PCIs for ACS cases in Japan.

Influence of COVID-19 pandemic on bystander interventions, emergency medical service activities, and patient outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Osaka City, Japan.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic may have negatively affected bystander interventions, emergency medical service (EMS) personnel activities, and patient outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). This study assessed bystander interventions, EMS activities, and patient outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic era and compared them with those during the non-COVID-19 pandemic era in Osaka City, Japan, where public-access automated external defibrillators (AEDs) are well established. METHODS: We conducted this population-based cohort study that included all cases with non-traumatic OHCA treated by EMS personnel and excluded cases with no resuscitation attempt, traumatic cases, cases occurring in healthcare facilities, or cases witnessed by EMS personnel. Data were compared between the COVID-19 pandemic period (February 1, 2020 to July 31, 2020) and the non-COVID-19 pandemic period (February 1, 2019 to July 31, 2019). RESULTS: During the study periods, 1687 patients were eligible for analyses (COVID-19: n = 825; non-COVID-19: n = 862). Patients with OHCA during the COVID-19 pandemic period were significantly less likely to receive bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (COVID-19: 33.0%; non-COVID-19: 41.3%; p < 0.001) and public-access AED pad application (COVID-19: 2.9%; non-COVID-19: 6.1%; p = 0.002) compared with patients during the non-COVID-19 pandemic period. There were no significant differences in 1-month survival with favorable neurological outcomes between the two periods (COVID-19: 4.6%; non-COVID-19: 6.1%; p = 0.196). CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic period did not affect patient outcomes after OHCA but changed bystander behaviors in Osaka City, Japan.

Influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on an emergency medical service system: a population-based, descriptive study in Osaka, Japan.

AIM: Novel coronavirus infection (COVID-19) was confirmed in Wuhan, China in December 2019, and the COVID-19 pandemic has spread around the world. However, no clinical studies on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergency medical service (EMS) systems have been carried out. METHODS: This was a retrospective study with a study period from 1 January 2020 to 14 April 2020. We included the patients transported by ambulance for acute diseases and traffic accidents in Osaka city, Japan. The main outcome of this study was the difficulty in hospital acceptance. We calculated the rate of difficulty of hospital acceptance for each month for acute diseases and traffic accidents. RESULTS: Between 1 January and 14 April 2020, 36,981 patients were transported to hospitals by ambulance for acute diseases and 3,096 patients for traffic accidents. There was no difference in the proportion of the difficulty in hospital acceptance due to traffic accidents between 2019 and 2020, but there was an increase in the proportion of the difficulty in hospital acceptance due to acute disease after the 13th week (25-31 March) of 2020 compared to that of 2019. The odds ratio in April was 2.17 (95% confidence interval, 1.84-2.58) for acute disease. CONCLUSION: We assessed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the EMS system in Osaka City, Japan and found that, since April 2020, the EMS system in Osaka City has been facing difficulty in terms of hospital acceptance of patients transported to hospital for acute diseases.